[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Banashankar KV banveerad at gmail.com
Wed Sep 23 00:00:53 UTC 2015


But whatever it is, I think we can't run the current heat template  as it
is for v2, those things must be ported no matter what.
So I think our main concern here is coexistence of v1 and v2 heat support.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks
Banashankar


On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Doug Wiegley <dougwig at parksidesoftware.com>
wrote:

> The other option would be to change the namespace.  (Os::Lbaas instead of
> Os::Neutron).  The neutron CLI does something similar with neutron-lb-*
> versus neutron-lbaas-*, e.g.
>
> One wrinkle with heat supporting both is that neutron doesn’t support both
> running at the same time, which certainly hurts the migration strategy. I
> think the answer at the time was that you could have different api servers
> running each version. Is that something that heat can deal with?
>
> (I still don’t like that I can’t run both at the same time, and would love
> to re-litigate that argument.  :-)  ).
>
> Thanks,
> doug
>
>
>
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Banashankar KV <banveerad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, sounds good. So now the question is how should we name the new V2
> resources ?
>
>
> Thanks
> Banashankar
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Yes, hence the need to support the v2 resources as seperate things. Then
>> I can rewrite the templates to include the new resources rather then the
>> old resources as appropriate. IE, it will be a porting effort to rewrite
>> them. Then do a heat update on the stack to migrate it from lbv1 to lbv2.
>> Since they are different resources, it should create the new and delete the
>> old.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Banashankar KV [banveerad at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM
>>
>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for
>> LbaasV2
>>
>> But I think, V2 has introduced some new components and whole association
>> of the resources with each other is changed, we should be still able to do
>> what Kevin has mentioned ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Banashankar
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> There needs to be a way to have both v1 and v2 supported in one
>>> engine....
>>>
>>> Say I have templates that use v1 already in existence (I do), and I want
>>> to be able to heat stack update on them one at a time to v2. This will
>>> replace the v1 lb with v2, migrating the floating ip from the v1 lb to the
>>> v2 one. This gives a smoothish upgrade path.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kevin
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Brandon Logan [brandon.logan at RACKSPACE.COM]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:22 PM
>>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2
>>>
>>> Well I'd hate to have the V2 postfix on it because V1 will be deprecated
>>> and removed, which means the V2 being there would be lame.  Is there any
>>> kind of precedent set for for how to handle this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brandon
>>> On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 14:49 -0700, Banashankar KV wrote:
>>> > So are we thinking of making it as ?
>>> > OS::Neutron::LoadBalancerV2
>>> >
>>> > OS::Neutron::ListenerV2
>>> >
>>> > OS::Neutron::PoolV2
>>> >
>>> > OS::Neutron::PoolMemberV2
>>> >
>>> > OS::Neutron::HealthMonitorV2
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > and add all those into the loadbalancer.py of heat engine ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Banashankar
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Sergey Kraynev
>>> > <skraynev at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>> >         Brandon.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         As I understand we v1 and v2 have differences also in list of
>>> >         objects and also in relationships between them.
>>> >         So I don't think that it will be easy to upgrade old resources
>>> >         (unfortunately).
>>> >         I'd agree with second Kevin's suggestion about implementation
>>> >         new resources in this case.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         I see, that a lot of guys, who wants to help  with it :) And I
>>> >         suppose, that me and Rabi Mishra may try to help with it,
>>> >         because we was involvement in implementation of v1 resources
>>> >         in Heat.
>>> >         Follow the list of v1 lbaas resources in Heat:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::LoadBalancer
>>> >
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::Pool
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::PoolMember
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::HealthMonitor
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         Also, I suppose, that it may be discussed during summit
>>> >         talks :)
>>> >         Will add to etherpad with potential sessions.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         Regards,
>>> >         Sergey.
>>> >
>>> >         On 22 September 2015 at 22:27, Brandon Logan
>>> >         <brandon.logan at rackspace.com> wrote:
>>> >                 There is some overlap, but there was some incompatible
>>> >                 differences when
>>> >                 we started designing v2.  I'm sure the same issues
>>> >                 will arise this time
>>> >                 around so new resources sounds like the path to go.
>>> >                 However, I do not
>>> >                 know much about Heat and the resources so I'm speaking
>>> >                 on a very
>>> >                 uneducated level here.
>>> >
>>> >                 Thanks,
>>> >                 Brandon
>>> >                 On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:38 +0000, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>> >                 > We're using the v1 resources...
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 > If the v2 ones are compatible and can seamlessly
>>> >                 upgrade, great
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 > Otherwise, make new ones please.
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 > Thanks,
>>> >                 > Kevin
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>>  ______________________________________________________________________
>>> >                 > From: Banashankar KV [banveerad at gmail.com]
>>> >                 > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:07 AM
>>> >                 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>>> >                 usage questions)
>>> >                 > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat
>>> >                 support for
>>> >                 > LbaasV2
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 > Hi Brandon,
>>> >                 > Work in progress, but need some input on the way we
>>> >                 want them, like
>>> >                 > replace the existing lbaasv1 or we still need to
>>> >                 support them ?
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 > Thanks
>>> >                 > Banashankar
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Brandon Logan
>>> >                 > <brandon.logan at rackspace.com> wrote:
>>> >                 >         Hi Banashankar,
>>> >                 >         I think it'd be great if you got this going.
>>> >                 One of those
>>> >                 >         things we
>>> >                 >         want to have and people ask for but has
>>> >                 always gotten a lower
>>> >                 >         priority
>>> >                 >         due to the critical things needed.
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >         Thanks,
>>> >                 >         Brandon
>>> >                 >         On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 17:57 -0700,
>>> >                 Banashankar KV wrote:
>>> >                 >         > Hi All,
>>> >                 >         > I was thinking of starting the work on
>>> >                 heat to support
>>> >                 >         LBaasV2,  Is
>>> >                 >         > there any concerns about that?
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >         > I don't know if it is the right time to
>>> >                 bring this up :D .
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >         > Thanks,
>>> >                 >         > Banashankar (bana_k)
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >                 >         > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
>>> >                 for usage questions)
>>> >                 >         > Unsubscribe:
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> >                 >         >
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >                 >         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>>> >                 usage questions)
>>> >                 >         Unsubscribe:
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >                 > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>>> >                 questions)
>>> >                 > Unsubscribe:
>>> >
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> >                 >
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >                 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>>> >                 questions)
>>> >                 Unsubscribe:
>>> >
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>  __________________________________________________________________________
>>> >         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> >         Unsubscribe:
>>> >         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> > Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150922/8f4dfba7/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list