[openstack-dev] [neutron] subnetallocation is in core resource, while there is a extension for it?
Tidwell, Ryan
ryan.tidwell at hp.com
Tue Sep 1 23:59:07 UTC 2015
This was a compromise we made toward the end of Kilo. The subnetpools resource was implemented as a core resource, but for purposes of Horizon interaction and a lack of another method for evolving the Neutron API we deliberately added a shim extension. I believe this was done with a couple other “extensions” like VLAN transparent networks. I don’t think we want to remove the shim extension.
-Ryan
From: gong_ys2004 [mailto:gong_ys2004 at aliyun.com]
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 9:45 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] subnetallocation is in core resource, while there is a extension for it?
Hi, neutron guys,
look at https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/extensions/subnetallocation.py,
which defines an extension Subnetallocation but defines no extension resource. Actually, it is implemented
in core resource.
So I think we should remove this extension.
I filed a bug for it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1490815
Regards,
yong sheng gong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150901/abcecb5a/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list