Open Stack

Dmitry,

thanks for analysis. I have a few questions:

1) First graph shows around 38 bugs open in average, and about 10 bugs
incoming every day. Are those Critical + High (Medium, Low are excluded?).
I'm getting it through the context, but wanted to double check.

2) It is great to see that we can track regressions and bugs in features
being developed in the current release. You are mentioning upgrades (8
bugs), network templates & node groups (6 bugs) - do these features
contribute majority of issues we are seeing in functionality being
developed? Is there a way to get bugs count per feature, per team or per
component easily?

3) As a side note to #2 - why do you combine network templates & node
groups? I have a sense that network templates is the feature delivered in
7.0. If it doesn't intersect with multirack though (and in this case I'd
consider bugs related to multirack).

4) I see 0 for long-haul testing, but LP search with tag
"long-haul-testing" shows two bugs:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1490597 - seems to be in the Fuel scope

https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1498867 - seems to be Nova issue, or
Nova deployment configuration issue (out of scope of Fuel). Do you use a
different filter to search?

Thank you,

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:15 PM Dmitry Pyzhov <dpyzhov at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Here is report for current bugs status. Let me focus on python and library
> defects in this report.
>
> [image: PastedGraphic-3.png][image: PastedGraphic-5.png]
>
> We have stable income of high priority bugs. It is about 10 bugs/week. And
> we have greater outcome. By the beginning of Friday, 13th we had only 5
> unassigned bugs in python and all of them are tricky. And we had 0
> unassigned bugs in library.
>
> Here is the list of unassigned bugs:
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1461562 - really crazy astute stuff
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1504572 - we have a discussion in e-mail and
> looks like we have an agreement here
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1506008 - maybe it can be fixed in the scope
> of lifecycle story?
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1506112 - another symlinks issue with our
> remote logging
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1508807 - one more case when astute doesn’t
> see puppet failure
> My team will be grateful for triaging and hints.
>
> Actually, this is a good point. At the beginning of Friday 13th we had all
> other high priority bugs assigned. And assignees confirmed that they are
> able to deliver fix in 8.0 timeframe. This doesn’t include bugs for 8.0
> features, I’ll talk about it little bit later.
>
> On Friday 13th we’ve got 4 new high priority bug reports in library, 1 bug
> was moved to library from neutron team and we’ve got 4 high priority bug
> reports in python. And only one python bug of them is a regression. Lovely
> day.
>
> Now let’s talk about regressions and bugs for 8.0 features.
>
> [image: PastedGraphic-4.png][image: PastedGraphic-6.png]
>
> We still have getting more bugs than we fix. We have 8 open bugs for
> upgrades story, 6 open bugs in network templates and nodegroups and 7
> regressions caused by new patches. Numbers are manageable but trend doesn’t
> look good. By the way, we have 7 high priority bugs in UI (not counted on
> my charts) and this number is going up.
>
> [image: PastedGraphic-14.png]
>
> In average we are getting about 3 invalid high priority bug reports per
> week.
>
> [image: PastedGraphic-9.png][image: PastedGraphic-10.png]
>
> Looks like situation with swarm blockers is under control. We have 2
> blockers in progress, 1 assigned and 1 incomplete.
>
> [image: PastedGraphic-15.png][image: PastedGraphic-16.png]
>
> We still have huge number of medium and low priority bugs. You can see
> stable positive trend. But it is slow and we’ll not be able to fix all
> medium bugs by SCF time.
>
> Let me finish my report with raw data in the same format as I used last
> week.
>
> Bugs in UI, python, library
>
> Format: Total open(UI open/Python open/Library open) +Total income
> (UI/Python/Library) -Total outcome(UI/Python/Library)
>
> Real bugs:
> - Critical/high: 61(7/35/19) +33(3/16/14) -34(1/11/22)
> - Medium/low: 203(47/104/52) +35(5/17/13) -36(1/15/20)
> Features tracked as bug reports:
> - Critical/high: 44(1/37/6) +1(0/1/0) -4(1/3/0)
> - Medium/low: 109(3/88/18) +5(0/2/3) -3(0/0/3)
> Technical debt bugs:
> - Critical/high: 14(0/9/5) +0(0/0/0) -1(0/0/1)
> - Medium/low: 97(1/72/24) +7(0/4/3) -5(1/3/1)
>
> Bugs in other teams. Format: Total open(High) +Total income(High) -Total
> outcome(High)
> - QA: 83(26) +23(8) -13(4)
> - Docs: 157(36) +3(1) -3(1)
> - Devops: 60(24) +14(10) -18(12)
> - Build: 37(9) +11(8) -9(6)
> - CI: 61(31) +16(11) -18(11)
> - MOS: 59(21) +12(5) -8(3)
> - Partners: 14(7) +2(2) -0(0)
> - MOS Linux: 26(5) +2(0) -0(0)
> - Plugins: 3(1) +1(0) -2(0)
>
> Extra filters:
> - Swarm blockers: 3(0/1/2) +1(0/0/1) -5(0/0/5)
> - Security bugs: 7(0/0/7) +1(0/0/1) -2(0/0/2)
> - Long haul testing: 0(0/0/0) +0(0/0/0) -0(0/0/0)
> - Regressions: 23(2/18/3) +14(2/8/4) -11(1/4/6)
> - QA/Docs/Infra: 398(126) +67(38) -61(34)
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 38031 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0009.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-5.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0010.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 41914 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0011.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-6.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14262 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0012.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-14.png
Type: image/png
Size: 36693 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0013.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-9.png
Type: image/png
Size: 43403 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0014.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-10.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12926 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0015.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-15.png
Type: image/png
Size: 27061 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0016.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-16.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12916 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151117/2d1c2543/attachment-0017.png>