[openstack-dev] [Magnum][Testing] Reduce Functional testing ongate.
Kai Qiang Wu
wkqwu at cn.ibm.com
Fri Nov 13 05:33:23 UTC 2015
Right now, we seems can not reduce devstack runtime. ANd @Ton, yes,
download image time seems OK in jenkins job, it found about 4~5 mins
But bay-creation time is interesting topic, it seems something related with
heat or VM setup time consumption. But needs some investigation.
Thanks
Best Wishes,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kai Qiang Wu (吴开强 Kennan)
IBM China System and Technology Lab, Beijing
E-mail: wkqwu at cn.ibm.com
Tel: 86-10-82451647
Address: Building 28(Ring Building), ZhongGuanCun Software Park,
No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China
100193
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow your heart. You are miracle!
From: "Ton Ngo" <ton at us.ibm.com>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions
\)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date: 13/11/2015 01:13 pm
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Testing] Reduce Functional testing
on gate.
Thanks Eli for the analysis. I notice that the time to download the image
is only around 1:15 mins out of some 21 mins to set up devstack. So it
seems trying to reduce the size of the image won't make a significant
improvement in the devstack time. I wonder how the image size affects the
VM creation time for the cluster. If we can look at the Heat event stream,
we might get an idea.
Ton,
Inactive hide details for Egor Guz ---11/12/2015 05:25:15 PM---Eli, First
of all I would like to say thank you for your effort Egor Guz ---11/12/2015
05:25:15 PM---Eli, First of all I would like to say thank you for your
effort (I never seen so many path sets ;)),
From: Egor Guz <EGuz at walmartlabs.com>
To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date: 11/12/2015 05:25 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Testing] Reduce Functional testing on
gate.
Eli,
First of all I would like to say thank you for your effort (I never seen so
many path sets ;)), but I don’t think we should remove “tls_disabled=True”
tests from gates now (maybe in L).
It’s still vey commonly used feature and backup plan if TLS doesn’t work
for some reasons.
I think it’s good idea to group tests per pipeline we should definitely
follow it.
―
Egor
From: "Qiao,Liyong" <liyong.qiao at intel.com<mailto:liyong.qiao at intel.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>
Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 23:02
To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<
mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>"
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Magnum][Testing] Reduce Functional testing on
gate.
hello all:
I will update some Magnum functional testing status, functional/integration
testing
is important to us, since we change/modify the Heat template rapidly, we
need to
verify the modification is correct, so we need to cover all templates
Magnum has.
and currently we only has k8s testing(only test with atomic image), we need
to
add more, like swarm(WIP), mesos(under plan), also , we may need to support
COS image.
lots of work need to be done.
for the functional testing time costing, we discussed during the Tokyo
summit,
Adrian expected that we can reduce the timing cost to 20min.
I did some analyses on the functional/integrated testing on gate pipeline.
the stages will be follows:
take k8s functional testing for example, we did follow testing case:
1) baymodel creation
2) bay(tls_disabled=True) creation/deletion
3) bay(tls_disabled=False) creation to testing k8s api and delete it after
testing.
for each stage, the time costing is follows:
* devstack prepare: 5-6 mins
* Running devstack: 15 mins(include downloading atomic image)
* 1) and 2) 15 mins
* 3) 15 +3 mins
totally about 60 mins currently a example is 1h 05m 57s
see
http://logs.openstack.org/10/243910/1/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-k8s/5e61039/console.html
for all time stamps.
I don't think it is possible to reduce time to 20 mins, since devstack
setup will take 20 mins already.
To reduce time, I suggest to only create 1 bay each pipeline and do vary
kinds of testing
on this bay, if want to test some specify bay (for example, network_driver
etc), create
a new pipeline .
So, I think we can delete 2), since 3) will do similar things
(create/delete), the different is
3) use tls_disabled=False. what do you think ?
see https://review.openstack.org/244378 for the time costing, will reduce
to 45 min (48m 50s in the example.)
=================================
For other related functional testing works:
I 'v done the split of functional testing per COE, we have pipeline as:
* gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-api 30 mins
* gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-k8s 60 mins
And for swam pipeline, patches is done, under reviewing now(works fine on
gate)
https://review.openstack.org/244391
https://review.openstack.org/226125
========================
--
BR, Eli(Li Yong)Qiao
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151113/80840d64/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151113/80840d64/attachment.gif>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list