[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

Michael Davies michael at the-davies.net
Wed Nov 11 22:19:29 UTC 2015


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes <lucasagomes at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> So, what people think about it? Should we have a mid-cycle for the
> Mitaka release or not? If so, what format should we use?
>

I like the idea of having a midcycle as it's a useful sync point, so my
preference would be:

3. Coordinated regional mid-cycles (which probably means North America over
Europe for those in the Antipodes)
1. Normal mid-cycle
2. Virtual mid-cycle
4. Not having a mid-cycle at all

I find value in them, due to timezone challenges, but I'm probably unique
in this case.
-- 
Michael Davies   michael at the-davies.net
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151112/b9dd9383/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list