My order of preference would be: 1. Coordinated regional mid-cycles 2. Normal mid-cycle 3. Virtual mid-cycle 4. No mid-cycle Thanks, John On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes <lucasagomes at gmail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > In the last Ironic meeting [1] we started a discussion about whether > we need to have a mid-cycle meeting for the Mitaka cycle or not. Some > ideas about the format of the midcycle were presented in that > conversation and this email is just a follow up on that conversation. > > The ideas presented were: > > 1. Normal mid-cycle > > Same format as the previous ones, the meetup will happen in a specific > venue somewhere in the world. > > 2. Virtual mid-cycle > > People doing a virtual hack session on IRC / google hangout / > others... Something like virtual sprints [2]. > > 3. Coordinated regional mid-cycles > > Having more than one meetup happening in different parts of the world > with a preferable time overlap between them so we could use video > conference for some hours each day to sync up what was done/discussed > on each of the meetups. > > 4. Not having a mid-cycle at all > > > So, what people think about it? Should we have a mid-cycle for the > Mitaka release or not? If so, what format should we use? > > Other ideas are also welcome. > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2015/ironic.2015-11-09-17.00.log.html > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints > > Cheers, > Lucas > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151111/88f0f0b3/attachment.html>