[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Quick poll: OpenStackClient command for provision action
Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasagomes at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 09:28:27 UTC 2015
Hi,
> Let's have a quick poll, which would you prefer and why:
>
> 1. openstack baremetal provision state --provide UUID
> 2. openstack baremetal provision --provide UUID
> 3. openstack baremetal provide UUID
> 4. openstack baremetal set provision state --provide UUID
> 5. openstack baremetal set state --provide UUID
> 6. openstack baremetal action --provide UUID
I know very little about OSC and it's syntax, but what I would do in
this case is to follow the same syntax as the command that changes the
power state of the nodes. Apparently the power state command proposed
[1] follows the syntax:
$ openstack baremetal power --on | --off <UUID>
I would expect provision state to follow the same, perhaps
$ openstack baremetal provision --provide | --active | ... <UUID>
So my vote goes to make both power and provision state syntax
consistent. (Which currently is the option # 2, but none patches are
merged yet)
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172517/28
Cheers,
Lucas
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list