Open Stack

+1

--Adam

https://keybase.io/rm_you


From: Doug Wiegley <dougwig at parksidesoftware.com<mailto:dougwig at parksidesoftware.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

+1

Governance patch filed:
https://review.openstack.org/179417

Thanks,
doug


On May 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Jorge Miramontes <jorge.miramontes at RACKSPACE.COM<mailto:jorge.miramontes at RACKSPACE.COM>> wrote:

Good stuff. Thanks everyone for your hard work on getting Octavia to this point!

Cheers,
--Jorge

From: Brandon Logan <brandon.logan at RACKSPACE.COM<mailto:brandon.logan at RACKSPACE.COM>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 10:20 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

​+1 from me
________________________________
From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com<mailto:mestery at mestery.com>>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 8:53 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Eichberger, German <german.eichberger at hp.com<mailto:german.eichberger at hp.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I am proposing that Octavia is joining the Networking program as a project
under the Services area.

Octavia is the open scalable reference implementation for Neutron LBaaS V2
and has always seen itself as part of the networking program. We have
adopted most governance rules from the Networking program, sharing the
same build structure, and are organized like an OpenDStack project.


This sounds fine to me German. To proceed here, propose something similar to what Russell has proposed for OVN here [1], and ping me on IRC with the review so I can ack it. The TC can then approve it at a future meeting.

Thanks!
Kyle

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175954/

Thanks,
German



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150501/5167c961/attachment.html>