[openstack-dev] [puppet] Moving under the "big tent"

Sebastien Badia seb at sebian.fr
Thu Mar 26 17:08:23 UTC 2015

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 05:06:14PM (+0100), Yanis Guenane wrote:
>To match user expectations, I think we should -as much as possible-
>act as a layer on top of the project themselves. So if the project the
>module installs is an official Openstack project, the module should be
>supported. Else 'incubated'. If modules for 'official' projects are
>not as proof ready as other might be, we should focus more on this one
>during a certain amount of time to bring it up to the other standard.

Completely agree with your point here Yanis!
Our puppet modules are only a way to deploy a piece of software, and we must
as much as possible follow upstream configurations and focus on our modules not
enough « mature ». Every OpenStack core project¹ must have a mature puppet


Sebastien Badia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150326/927ea2df/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list