Open Stack

A couple more responses were submitted but 1500 on Tuesdays is still in
first place. Since there was no further discussion, we'll meet next week at
1500 on Tuesday in #openstack-meeting-4 (no Monday meeting). I've edited
the meetings wiki to indicate this. If you have topics to discuss at the
meeting, please add them to the agenda here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/PuppetOpenStack#Agenda

Colleen (crinkle)

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Colleen Murphy <colleen at puppetlabs.com>
wrote:

> Based on the results of https://doodle.com/wuhsuafq5tibzugg we have two
> contenders, in 1st place is 1500 on Tuesdays and in 2nd is 1600 on
> Thursdays. 1500 Tuesdays has an opening in #openstack-meeting-4 and 1600
> Thursdays has openings in #openstack-meeting and #openstack-meeting-3.
>
> Since 1500 on Tuesdays has more votes it makes sense to book that time in
> #openstack-meeting-4. If there are objections or concerns please voice them
> here.
>
> Colleen (crinkle)
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Colleen Murphy <colleen at puppetlabs.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Re-schedule Puppet OpenStack meeting
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:49:13 -0400
>>> From: Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com>
>>> Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <
>>> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Since OPS midcycle discussions, it seems we need to reschedule the
>>> meeting again.
>>>
>> The proposed times were based on what the folks at the midcycle said
>> seemed reasonable for them, but I understand that there were plenty of us
>> who were not there who would still want to participate and have their
>> availability considered. Perhaps if there are people for whom none of the
>> proposed slots work, they can comment here or fill out the poll with none
>> of the boxes checked? Obviously we can't make it work for absolutely
>> everyone, but I'm hoping not to exclude too many people.
>>
>> Colleen
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150320/95795ace/attachment.html>