[openstack-dev] [nova] what is our shipped paste.ini going to be for Kilo

Ed Leafe ed at leafe.com
Mon Mar 16 15:19:17 UTC 2015

On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:08 AM, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com> wrote:
>> Drop of /v1.1 ?
>> ---------------
>> Only new deploys are really going to base off of our in tree
>> config. I'm not convinced that we want to encourage people setting up
>> new /v1.1 endpoint in tree.
>> I'm not convinced there is a deprecation path here because the ones I
>> could imagine would involve people changing their paste.ini to include
>> a deprecation checking piece of code.
>> Honestly, I don't care strongly either way on this one. It's cruft,
>> but not dangerous cruft (unlike v3).
> +1
> Lets drop the cruft now. People who feel they need it can add it back.

Agreed on this. The less cruft we carry, the better.

-- Ed Leafe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150316/6ce385f0/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list