Open Stack

I'll keep it in mind not to create unnecessary backports, although I really
find it more convenient to do them once I submit changes to master for
review. I apologize for [4], it indeed was wrong and it won't happen again.

Regards,
Bartłomiej

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Ryan Moe <rmoe at mirantis.com> wrote:

> Here are some examples of proposing changes prior to being merged in
> master [0][1][2][3][4]. [0] is a perfect example of why this isn't a good
> process. A change was proposed to stable/6.0 before master was merged, and
> now the change to master needs to be reworked based on review feedback.
> Premature backporting just creates unnecessary additional work. I'd also
> like to give a friendly reminder to make sure we maintain the Change-Id and
> author of any change we backport.
>
> The wiki [5] has also been updated to make this explicit.
>
> [0]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ief8186006386af8ae7e40cffeeaeef5a5c0f3c70,n,z
> [1]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4c94bb03501f4238ead2378cf504485b7d67b236,n,z
> [2]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Ic15a3bfb6238e4281b06aae0a3f9fe4abf96590d,n,z
> [3]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7ab6dc2341821c3b82ef3d3ac63b64a5a9958fa9,n,z
> [4]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/Iff947f0053577f19441c04101e5a35a7820e40a0,n,z
> [5]
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Backport_bugfixes_to_stable_release_series
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Tomasz Napierala <tnapierala at mirantis.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 09 Mar 2015, at 18:21, Ryan Moe <rmoe at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've noticed a few times recently where reviews have been abandoned by
>> people who were not the original authors. These reviews were only days old
>> and there was no prior notice or discussion. This is both rude and
>> discouraging to contributors. Reasons for abandoning should be discussed on
>> the review and/or in email before any action is taken.
>>
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> I was trying to find any examples, and the only one I see is:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152674/
>>
>> I spoke to Bogdan and he agreed it was not proper way to do it, but they
>> were in a rush - I know, it does not explain anything really.
>>
>> Do you have any other examples? I’d like to clarify them
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
>> Sr. OpenStack Engineer
>> tnapierala at mirantis.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150311/5b8e1c09/attachment.html>