Open Stack

Russell Bryant wrote:
> One point of clarification:
> 
> On 03/10/2015 02:28 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>> Even more concerning is the sentiment of "projects we want to
>> consciously drop" from Russell's original email.
> 
> This was in reference to criteria defined in:
> 
> http://governance.openstack.org/reference/incubation-integration-requirements.html
> 
> For example, we previously had a strict requirement *against*
> duplication of functionality among OpenStack projects unless it was with
> intent and with a clear plan to replace the old thing.  In this new
> model, that would be a requirement we would consciously drop.

It's a requirement we *already* consciously dropped when we approved the
new projects requirements. Or do you mean you want to come back on that
decision[1]?

We can refine those rules as we go and consider applications and realize
the rules are incomplete... But denying their existence and ask to
freeze until they are defined sounds a bit weird. The rules are there.
Slow consideration of additions is the way to make iterative progress,
not freezing.

[1]
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/commit/?id=fcc4046f7d866d0516f2810571aad0c0ce2cc361

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)