[openstack-dev] Avoiding regression in project governance

Russell Bryant rbryant at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 19:02:13 UTC 2015

On 03/10/2015 02:56 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
>> One point of clarification:
>> On 03/10/2015 02:28 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
>>> Even more concerning is the sentiment of "projects we want to
>>> consciously drop" from Russell's original email.
>> This was in reference to criteria defined in:
>> http://governance.openstack.org/reference/incubation-integration-requirements.html
>> For example, we previously had a strict requirement *against*
>> duplication of functionality among OpenStack projects unless it was with
>> intent and with a clear plan to replace the old thing.  In this new
>> model, that would be a requirement we would consciously drop.
> It's a requirement we *already* consciously dropped when we approved the
> new projects requirements. Or do you mean you want to come back on that
> decision[1]?

No, I don't want to come back on it.  It was obviously a poorly worded
comment.  It was an attempt to say that I'd like it if we were closer to
having tags that covered most of those requirements, except for the
things we no longer care about, such as the example given.

Russell Bryant

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list