Open Stack

Hi all,

I would also vote for (C) with 1600 UTC or later.  This  will hopefully increase more participation from the Pacific time zone.

Thanks,
—Hanif.

From: Mathieu Rohon
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 1:52 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

Hi,

I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on maintaining the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out, adding StrongSwan support and adding functional tests.
Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding new use cases such as edge-vpn.
Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be those edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

[1]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy <srics.r at gmail.com<mailto:srics.r at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Paul.

I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC (or later).

The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy Kilo cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things going forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and, perhaps, other vpn variants.

- Sridhar

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali <pc at michali.net<mailto:pc at michali.net>> wrote:
Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing list (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my email address used - sorry for the confusion!

So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still available), and we can discuss this...


We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what the preference would be regarding meetings...

A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
B) hold at a different day/time.
C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.

Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick B or C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)

Regards,

PCM

Twitter: @pmichali
TEXT: 6032894458<tel:6032894458>
PCM (Paul Michali)

IRC............ pc_m (irc.freenode.com<http://irc.freenode.com>)
Twitter....... @pmichali


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150306/86b5b2da/attachment.html>