Open Stack

Hi,

I'm fine with C) and 1600 UTC would be more adapted for EU time Zone :)

However, I Agree that neutron-vpnaas meetings was mainly focus on
maintaining the current IPSec implementation, by managing the slip out,
adding StrongSwan support and adding functional tests.
Maybe we will get a broader audience once we will speak about adding new
use cases such as edge-vpn.
Edge-vpn use cases overlap with the Telco WG VPN use case [1]. May be those
edge-vpn discussions should occur during the Telco WG meeting?

[1]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TelcoWorkingGroup/UseCases#VPN_Instantiation

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy <srics.r at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul.
>
> I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC (or
> later).
>
> The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy Kilo
> cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things going
> forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss edge-vpn and, perhaps,
> other vpn variants.
>
> - Sridhar
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Paul Michali <pc at michali.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi all! The email, that I sent on 2/24 didn't make it to the mailing list
>> (no wonder I didn't get responses!). I think I had an issue with my email
>> address used - sorry for the confusion!
>>
>> So, I'll hold the meeting today (1500 UTC meeting-4, if it is still
>> available), and we can discuss this...
>>
>>
>> We've been having very low turnout for meetings for the past several
>> weeks, so I'd like to ask those in the community interested in VPNaaS, what
>> the preference would be regarding meetings...
>>
>> A) hold at the same day/time, but only on-demand.
>> B) hold at a different day/time.
>> C) hold at a different day/time, but only on-demand.
>> D) hold as a on-demand topic in main Neutron meeting.
>>
>> Please vote your interest, and provide desired day/time, if you pick B or
>> C. The fallback will be (D), if there's not much interest anymore for
>> meeting, or we can't seem to come to a consensus (or super-majority :)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> PCM
>>
>> Twitter: @pmichali
>> TEXT: 6032894458
>> PCM (Paul Michali)
>>
>> IRC............ pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
>> Twitter....... @pmichali
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150305/b1f4e1d7/attachment.html>