[openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
mfedosin at mirantis.com
Thu Mar 5 23:38:06 UTC 2015
I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called
Glance Review Guidelines
and it has a section "For cores". It's easy to include some concrete rules
there to add more clarity.
2015-03-05 17:46 GMT+03:00 Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 03/05/2015 11:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
> > Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have
> > official rules for that:
> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam where it says: "A
> > member of the team may be removed at any time by the PTL. This is
> > typically due to a drop off of involvement by the member such that
> > they are no longer meeting expectations to maintain team
> > membership". https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronCore "The PTL
> > may remove a member from neutron-core at any time. Typically when a
> > member has decreased their involvement with the project through a
> > drop in reviews and participation in general project development,
> > the PTL will propose their removal and remove them. Members who
> > have previously been core may be fast-tracked back into core if
> > their involvement picks back up" So, as Louis has mentioned, it's a
> > routine work, and why should we be any different? Also, I suggest
> > to write the same wiki document for Glance to prevent these issues
> > in the future.
> Does the rule belong to e.g. governance repo? It seems like a sane
> requirement for core *reviewers* to actually review code, no? Or are
> there any projects that would not like to adopt such a rule formally?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev