<div dir="ltr">I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called Glance Review Guidelines <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iia0BjQoXvry9XSbf30DRwQt--ODglw-ZTT_5RJabsI/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iia0BjQoXvry9XSbf30DRwQt--ODglw-ZTT_5RJabsI/edit?usp=sharing</a> and it has a section "For cores". It's easy to include some concrete rules there to <span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">add</span> <span class="">more clarity</span><span class="">.</span></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-03-05 17:46 GMT+03:00 Ihar Hrachyshka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ihrachys@redhat.com" target="_blank">ihrachys@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
On 03/05/2015 11:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:<br>
> Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have<br>
> official rules for that:<br>
> <a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam</a> where it says: "A<br>
> member of the team may be removed at any time by the PTL. This is<br>
> typically due to a drop off of involvement by the member such that<br>
> they are no longer meeting expectations to maintain team<br>
> membership". <a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronCore" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronCore</a> "The PTL<br>
> may remove a member from neutron-core at any time. Typically when a<br>
> member has decreased their involvement with the project through a<br>
> drop in reviews and participation in general project development,<br>
> the PTL will propose their removal and remove them. Members who<br>
> have previously been core may be fast-tracked back into core if<br>
> their involvement picks back up" So, as Louis has mentioned, it's a<br>
> routine work, and why should we be any different? Also, I suggest<br>
> to write the same wiki document for Glance to prevent these issues<br>
> in the future.<br>
><br>
<br>
Does the rule belong to e.g. governance repo? It seems like a sane<br>
requirement for core *reviewers* to actually review code, no? Or are<br>
there any projects that would not like to adopt such a rule formally?<br>
<br>
/Ihar<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU+GxdAAoJEC5aWaUY1u579mEIAMN/wucsahaZ0yMT2/eo8t05<br>
rIWI+lBLjNueWJgB+zNbVlVcsKBZ/hl4J0O3eE65RtlTS5Rta5hv0ymyRL1nnUZH<br>
g/tL3ogEF0SsSBkiavVh3klGmUwsvQ+ygPN5rVgnbiJ+uO555EPlbiHwZHbcjBoI<br>
lyUjIhWzUCX26wq7mgiTsY858UgdEt3urVHD9jTE2WNszMRLXQ7vsoAik9xDfISz<br>
E0eZ8WVQKlNHNox0UoKbobdb3YDhmY3Ahp9Fj2cT1IScyQGORnm0hXV3+pRdWNhD<br>
1M/gDwAf97F1lfNxPpy4JCGutbe5zoPQYLpJExzaXkqqARxUnwhB1gZ9lEG8l2o=<br>
=lcLY<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
__________________________________________________________________________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>