[openstack-dev] [puppet][ceph] puppet-ceph CI status

David Moreau Simard dmsimard at iweb.com
Tue Jun 30 23:26:06 UTC 2015


I merged the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197302/ as we had agreed that once we had enough +1's on the EL7 review we would merge it.

The Puppet4 spec tests had already been approved.

--
David Moreau Simard
Cloud Engineering | Operations

On 2015-06-30 07:06 PM, Andrew Woodward wrote:


On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:28 AM Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com<mailto:emilien at redhat.com>> wrote:


On 06/29/2015 11:16 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
> Ah, I don't have +2 on that repo, but the lgtm so your original plan is
> fine.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Matt Fischer <<mailto:matt at mattfischer.com>matt at mattfischer.com<mailto:matt at mattfischer.com>
> <mailto:matt at mattfischer.com<mailto:matt at mattfischer.com>>> wrote:
>
>     I can take a look at these tonight. Maybe also Clayton can review
>     them? Neither of us were involved in the patches to my knowledge.
>
>     On Jun 29, 2015 5:09 PM, "Andrew Woodward" <<mailto:xarses at gmail.com>xarses at gmail.com<mailto:xarses at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:xarses at gmail.com<mailto:xarses at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
>         Hi
>
>         Recent changes in the puppet modules infra left
>         stackforge/puppet-ceph CI broken. We've resolved the issues in
>         [1][2] However we are short on non-involved core-reviewers.

You'll have to sqash the commits because our CI is voting for puppet4 &
beaker.
Thanks

David squished it up into [3]. The same message applies I'm going to use lazy census here and if we don't have any negative feed back we should just merge it so we get CI back to passing

[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197302/


If this module does not fit for you, you can still patch project-config,
otherwise you'll need to fix everything in one single commit.

>         I propose that we leave the patchs open through Wednesday and
>         use lazy consensus and merge it if we don't receive any negative
>         feedback.
>
>         [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179645/
>         [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195959/
>         --
>
>         --
>
>         Andrew Woodward
>
>         Mirantis
>
>         Fuel Community Ambassador
>
>         Ceph Community
>
>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>         Unsubscribe:
>         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

--
Emilien Macchi

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--

--

Andrew Woodward

Mirantis

Fuel Community Ambassador

Ceph Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150630/82a7aea4/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list