[openstack-dev] [Mistral][Murano] What's the latest/greatest on YAQL?

Serg Melikyan smelikyan at mirantis.com
Tue Jun 30 09:08:44 UTC 2015


Hi Dmitri,

We share your concerns and migration to the new YAQL is our priority too.
Regarding estimates, I would say month in a worst case.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Dmitri Zimine <dzimine at stackstorm.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Stan,
>
> This release is few more months. How soon?  Are you planning to support
> 0.2 in the meantime?
>
> We are really pressed on this transition to 1.0.
> For instance. Number 1 user error while dealing with YAQL is using ==
> instead of =.
> We had this discussion and you and Alex and you suggested it’s easy to
> redefine.
>
> But… … The short is we need to move to 1.0 to do it. Because from what I
> figured so far, in 0.2 I can’t naively extend the an operator, as it won’t
> parse. I did make it work on 0.2 but this required a hack in the YAQL
> library itself, need to add ‘==‘ to both lexer.py and parser.py. At least
> what I figured.
>
> I see the tokens are already generalized in 1.0. It doesn’t seem to worth
> backporting it to 0.2, but if this is a way, let us know.
>
> Mistral is betting on YAQL, please help.
>
> DZ.
>
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 2:20 AM, Stan Lagun <slagun at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
> The plan is to move to yaql 1.0 this release.  Please do not merge yaql
> 1.0 into Mistral yet. Migration is going to happen really soon
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Stan Lagun
> Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis
>
> <slagun at mirantis.com>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Renat Akhmerov <rakhmerov at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it’s a pretty important thing that we’d like to clarify as soon as
>> possible.
>>
>> Any input from Murano team?
>>
>> Renat Akhmerov
>> @ Mirantis Inc.
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 26 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Dmitri Zimine <dzimine at stackstorm.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > it’s been some time,what’s the news:
>> >
>> > * Is Murano moving YAQL 1.0 in this cycle?
>> > * What’s your recommendation for this cycle - stay on 0.2.6 or move on?
>> > * Any progress on documentation?
>> >
>> > Thanks, DZ>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | smelikyan at mirantis.com

+7 (495) 640-4904, 0261
+7 (903) 156-0836
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150630/ffee6a34/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list