[openstack-dev] [packaging] RPM Packaging for OpenStack IRC Meeting
rbryant at redhat.com
Fri Jun 12 17:45:52 UTC 2015
On 06/12/2015 01:31 PM, Dirk Müller wrote:
>> If instead it seems
>> the differences are minor enough that combining efforts is a win for
>> everyone, then that's even better, but I don't see it as the required
>> outcome here personally.
> Right. We've started with an open discussion and not started with any
> of those two outcomes in mind already. I think thats also why we
> agreed to start with a "green field" and not seed the repos with any
> of the distro's existing spec files.
> To me it looks promising that we can mechanically compile the $distro
> policy conformant .spec file from the canonical upstream naming, and
> at some point that compile step might end up being a "cp".
Yikes ... having to start green field and drop history from the last
several years seems quite unfortunate. It kind of sounds like "too much
work to be worth it" to me, but I'm just on the sidelines here.
Anyway, my main objective was just to make sure nobody felt like
combining efforts was the only acceptable outcome. I'm happy with
whatever you all end up deciding is most helpful overall.
More information about the OpenStack-dev