[openstack-dev] [all][python3] use of six.iteritems()

Jay Pipes jaypipes at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 01:36:26 UTC 2015

On 06/09/2015 08:15 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> I'm very glad folk are working on Python3 ports.
> I'd like to call attention to one little wart in that process: I get
> the feeling that folk are applying a massive regex to find things like
> d.iteritems() and convert that to six.iteritems(d).
> I'd very much prefer that such a regex approach move things to
> d.items(), which is much easier to read.
> Here's why. Firstly, very very very few of our dict iterations are
> going to be performance sensitive in the way that iteritems() matters.
> Secondly, no really - unless you're doing HUGE dicts, it doesn't
> matter. Thirdly. Really, it doesn't.
> At 1 million items the overhead is 54ms[1]. If we're doing inner loops
> on million item dictionaries anywhere in OpenStack today, we have a
> problem. We might want to in e.g. the scheduler... if it held
> in-memory state on a million hypervisors at once, because I don't
> really to to imagine it pulling a million rows from a DB on every
> action. But then, we'd be looking at a whole 54ms. I think we could
> survive, if we did that (which we don't).
> So - please, no six.iteritems().



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list