2015-06-04 22:23 GMT+08:00 Ruby Loo <rlooyahoo at gmail.com>: > > > On 4 June 2015 at 02:58, Xu, Hejie <hejie.xu at intel.com> wrote: > >> ... >> And another guideline for when we should bump Mircoversion >> *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187896/* >> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187896/> >> >> > > This is timely because just this very minute I was going to send out email > to the Ironic community about this -- when *should* we bump the > microversion. For fear of hijacking this thread, I'm going to start a new > thread to discuss with Ironic folks first. > Thanks Ruby > > >> As I know, there already have a little different between Nova and >> Ironic’s implementation. Ironic return min/max version when the requested >> version doesn’t support in server by http-headers. There isn’t such thing >> in nova. But that is something for version negotiation we need for nova >> also. >> Sean have pointed out we should use response body instead of http >> headers, the body can includes error message. Really hope ironic team can >> take a >> look at if you guys have compelling reason for using http headers. >> > > I don't want to change the ironic code so let's go with http headers. > (That's a good enough reason, isn't it?) :-) > So I translate to we want to back-compatible. > > By the way, did you see Ironic's spec on the/our desired behaviour between > Ironic's server and client [1]? It's ... <add your own adjective here>. > Emm... It's... great! Good news is there isn't big different between nova and ironic. > > Thanks Alex! > > --ruby > > [1] > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/kilo/api-microversions.html > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150607/3eb6591c/attachment.html>