[openstack-dev] Standard way to indicate a partial blueprint implementation?

Alexis Lee alexisl at hp.com
Fri Jun 5 15:33:33 UTC 2015

Chris Friesen said on Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:57:54PM -0600:
> On 06/04/2015 05:23 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > I have personally been using:
> >
> >   Implements: partial-blueprint x
> >
> >but I don't actually care much. I would also be fine with:
> >
> >   Partially-Implements: blueprint x
> If we need one, second one gets my vote.
> I'm not sure we actually need one though.  Do we really care about
> the distinction between a commit that fully implements a blueprint
> and one that partially implements it?  I'd expect that most
> blueprints require multiple commits, and so "blueprint X" could
> implicitly be assumed to be a partial implementation in the common
> case.

We need something that looks like a tag to prevent hits on "blueprint
blah suggested this but I'm doing something else".

Call me crazy but this seems the obvious:

    Blueprint: xyzzy

Nova Engineer, HP Cloud.  AKA lealexis, lxsli.

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list