Open Stack

On 06/03/2015 12:32 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Guys,
>
> One more time it's NOT about reputation and it's NOT about believing
> somebody.
>
> It's about human nature. We are all making mistakes.

And if we do, we can always revert a patch.

> System that checks can code review merge patch is just extra check
> to avoid unintentional mistakes of core reviewers and make things
> self organized.

I suggest you start with trusting these leutnants and go forward with a 
social contract - and if that really does not work at all, let's discuss 
other options.

For the security guide, we have a social contract: It needs two +2s as 
usual - but one +2 from a security team member, one from a Documentation 
team member. This social contract works for our small group just fine 
and I encourage you to try it out,

Andreas
-- 
  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
   SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton,
        HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126