[openstack-dev] [Ironic] [TC] Discussion: changing Ironic's release model

Ruby Loo rlooyahoo at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 22:12:47 UTC 2015

On 28 May 2015 at 15:55, Jim Rollenhagen <jim at jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:

> ...
I also put an informational spec about this change up in the
> ironic-specs repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185171/. My goal was
> to discuss this in the spec, but the mailing list is fine too. There are
> some unanswered questions in that review that we should make sure we
> cover.
> I'm really excited about this, and hope it can lead to good outcomes for
> the rest of OpenStack in the future. :)
> // jim
Hi Jim, thanks for the spec! It'll be good to incorporate the feedback from
this thread, into the spec. To be honest, I'm apprehensive and worried
about this. As Devananda mentioned, the devil is in the details. I hope we
get enough of the details right, so that we aren't spending time wondering
about the process instead of doing coding and reviewing.

My main concern is that with my reviewer's hat on, I don't feel like it
will help me much. We are proposing more (smaller) releases, and as long as
people know that there is an upcoming release planned, they will try to get
their patches merged. So I think we're just spreading out the 'please
review my patch' requests, but at least I won't feel so bad now when I say
no, because they won't have to wait 6+ months to land their feature :)

Anyway, I'm open to this (or am I, maybe I'm just resigned to it cause the
train seems to be leaving), and hope to be pleasantly surprised ;)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150601/e3820334/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list