Open Stack

Hi guys,

@Sergii, you didn't pay attention. Evgeny Li has provided a ticket to
fix it [1].

@Sheena, fuel_plugins_builder isn't associated with Fuel releases.
Here's a list of all versions:

    fuel-plugin-builder 2.0.4
    fuel-plugin-builder 2.0.3
    fuel-plugin-builder 2.0.2
    fuel-plugin-builder 2.0.1
    fuel-plugin-builder 2.0.0
    fuel-plugin-builder 1.0.2
    fuel-plugin-builder 1.0.1

I can push tags for them.

Thanks,
Igor

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1479785

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Sheena Gregson <sgregson at mirantis.com> wrote:
> I would imagine we would want tags for any releases that have plugins
> associated, or we are planning to have plugins associated (so, 6.0, 6.1,
> 7.0).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Kalnitsky [mailto:ikalnitsky at mirantis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:46 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Feedback
>
> Hi Sheena,
>
> Sure, I can do it. Should I push tag only for last release or for all
> releases that are available on PyPI?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Sheena Gregson <sgregson at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>> So the only cores are Igor and Evgeniy?  Can one of you add tags for
>> the new release versions?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Sebastian Kalinowski [mailto:skalinowski at mirantis.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 8:02 AM
>>
>>
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Feedback
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-07-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Evgeniy L <eli at mirantis.com>:
>>
>> Hi Sheena,
>>
>>
>>
>> Created ticket to change the structure of the directories [1].
>>
>> And as far as I know any core can push tags into the repository,
>>
>> Sebastian, Igor and I.
>>
>>
>>
>> One correction: I'm not a core in fuel-plugins ;)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1479785
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Sheena Gregson
>> <sgregson at mirantis.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Evgeniy –
>>
>>
>>
>> For the items which you have listed actions, who should be responsible
>> for next steps?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sheena
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Evgeniy L [mailto:eli at mirantis.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:54 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Feedback
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Sergii, thank you for feedback,
>>
>>
>>
>>>> c. There is no documentation how to install fpb from github master
>>>> branch. It's very useful for developers who want to use latest
>>>> version. We should add something
>>
>>
>>
>> We had a documentation, but removed it because the newer fpb was
>> released,
>>
>> probably we should add this information permanently [1].
>>
>>
>>
>>>> a. We are doing the same mistake putting all things into one basket.
>>>> There should be 2 repositories. One for examples and one for fpb.
>>>> What's the goal of keeping fpb in directory and examples on top?
>>
>>
>>
>> These plugins are the data which are required for integration testing,
>>
>> we test that plugin build is not broken, which we run when patch gets
>>
>> published. I see nothing wrong with having the data for integration
>> testing
>>
>> in the same repository with product which should be tested.
>>
>> Also in previous release we *removed* all the plugins which are not
>>
>> related to the builder itself, lbaas and glusterfs.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> This breaks a couple of things
>>
>>
>>
>> Having data for testing in the repository doesn't break anything.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> b. I cannot build fpm with simple
>>
>>
>>
>> That is a good point, we should move code from fuel_plugin_builder
>> directory
>>
>> on top level, and move data for testing into examples directory.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> c. There is no tags as I can see only stable/6.0
>>
>>
>>
>> Correct, tags should be added.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> d. There are no tests to improve code quality pep8 flask8, code
>>>> coverage
>>
>>
>>
>> That is not true, there are more then one hundreds unit tests which we
>> run
>>
>> for each patch with python 2.6 and python 2.7, also there are
>> integration tests
>>
>> which check that for each patch we don't break validation and that we
>> can
>>
>> build plugins for previous versions. Plus there are functional tests
>> which are
>>
>> written by fuel-qa team, those tests check that we perform deployment
>>
>> with plugins and required functionality works correctly. Also there
>> *is*
>> pep8
>>
>> check [2].
>>
>>
>>
>>>> e. Repository doesn't follow community standards.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think this issue should be resolved with moving fuel_plugin_builder
>> directory
>>
>> on level higher, if not, please provide more specific description what
>> is wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> 3. Setting tab ...
>>
>>
>>
>> Agree.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FPlugins&diff=78677
>> &oldid=78204
>>
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-plugins/blob/master/fuel_plugin_bui
>> lder/tox.ini#L17-L21
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk
>> <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have started digging into plugins recently. There are many positive
>> things though I would like to point to some problem areas
>>
>> 1. Documentation
>>
>> a. It doesn't include the features of 7.0. There are many outstanding
>> features, though I needed to ping the developers to ask how these
>> features work. It means that it's almost impossible to develop plugins
>> for upcoming releases. The external developer needs to wait for
>> documentation so it creates a lag between release and plugin release.
>>
>> b. in [1] the statement about 'For Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS' should be
>> extended to 14.04. Also we don't need to add PATCH version as 12.04.2
>> is equivalent to
>> 12.04
>>
>> c. There is no documentation how to install fpb from github master branch.
>> It's very useful for developers who want to use latest version. We
>> should add something
>>
>> 2. Github repository [2] is messed up
>>
>> a. We are doing the same mistake putting all things into one basket.
>> There should be 2 repositories. One for examples and one for fpb.
>> What's the goal of keeping fpb in directory and examples on top? This
>> breaks a couple of things
>>
>> b. I cannot build fpm with simple
>>
>> pip install git+https://
>>
>> Instead I am forced to do
>>
>> git clone https://
>>
>> cd fuel-plugins
>>
>> pip install .
>>
>>
>>
>> c. There is no tags as I can see only stable/6.0
>>
>> d. There are no tests to improve code quality pep8 flask8, code
>> coverage
>>
>> e. Repository doesn't follow community standards.
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. Setting tab
>>
>> When plugin is installed, it's very hard to find in. In setting tab
>> it's somewhere between A and Z
>>
>> How is user supposed to find it? There should be a separator between
>> Core features and plugins. User must easily find, configure,
>> enable/disable them.
>>
>> P.S. I am asking everyone to add own concerns so we'll be able to make
>> a plan how to address them.
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/Plugins#Installation
>> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-plugins
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Sergii Golovatiuk,
>> Skype #golserge
>> IRC #holser
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev