[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Feedback

Evgeniy L eli at mirantis.com
Tue Jul 28 16:54:04 UTC 2015


Hi Sergii, thank you for feedback,

>> c. There is no documentation how to install fpb from github master
branch. It's very useful for developers who want to use latest version. We
should add something

We had a documentation, but removed it because the newer fpb was released,
probably we should add this information permanently [1].

>> a. We are doing the same mistake putting all things into one basket.
There should be 2 repositories. One for examples and one for fpb. What's
the goal of keeping fpb in directory and examples on top?

These plugins are the data which are required for integration testing,
we test that plugin build is not broken, which we run when patch gets
published. I see nothing wrong with having the data for integration testing
in the same repository with product which should be tested.
Also in previous release we *removed* all the plugins which are not
related to the builder itself, lbaas and glusterfs.

>> This breaks a couple of things

Having data for testing in the repository doesn't break anything.

>> b. I cannot build fpm with simple

That is a good point, we should move code from fuel_plugin_builder directory
on top level, and move data for testing into examples directory.

>> c. There is no tags as I can see only stable/6.0

Correct, tags should be added.

>> d. There are no tests to improve code quality pep8 flask8, code coverage

That is not true, there are more then one hundreds unit tests which we run
for each patch with python 2.6 and python 2.7, also there are integration
tests
which check that for each patch we don't break validation and that we can
build plugins for previous versions. Plus there are functional tests which
are
written by fuel-qa team, those tests check that we perform deployment
with plugins and required functionality works correctly. Also there *is*
pep8
check [2].

>> e. Repository doesn't follow community standards.

I think this issue should be resolved with moving fuel_plugin_builder
directory
on level higher, if not, please provide more specific description what is
wrong.

>> 3. Setting tab ...

Agree.

[1]
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FPlugins&diff=78677&oldid=78204
[2]
https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-plugins/blob/master/fuel_plugin_builder/tox.ini#L17-L21

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have started digging into plugins recently. There are many positive
> things though I would like to point to some problem areas
>
> 1. Documentation
>
> a. It doesn't include the features of 7.0. There are many outstanding
> features, though I needed to ping the developers to ask how these features
> work. It means that it's almost impossible to develop plugins for upcoming
> releases. The external developer needs to wait for documentation so it
> creates a lag between release and plugin release.
>
> b. in [1] the statement about 'For Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS' should be extended
> to 14.04. Also we don't need to add PATCH version as 12.04.2 is equivalent
> to 12.04
>
> c. There is no documentation how to install fpb from github master branch.
> It's very useful for developers who want to use latest version. We should
> add something
>
> 2. Github repository [2] is messed up
> a. We are doing the same mistake putting all things into one basket. There
> should be 2 repositories. One for examples and one for fpb. What's the goal
> of keeping fpb in directory and examples on top? This breaks a couple of
> things
>
> b. I cannot build fpm with simple
>
> pip install git+https://
>
> Instead I am forced to do
>
> git clone https://
> cd fuel-plugins
> pip install .
>
> c. There is no tags as I can see only stable/6.0
> d. There are no tests to improve code quality pep8 flask8, code coverage
> e. Repository doesn't follow community standards.
>
> 3. Setting tab
>
> When plugin is installed, it's very hard to find in. In setting tab it's
> somewhere between A and Z
> How is user supposed to find it? There should be a separator between Core
> features and plugins. User must easily find, configure, enable/disable them.
>
> P.S. I am asking everyone to add own concerns so we'll be able to make a
> plan how to address them.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/Plugins#Installation
> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-plugins
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergii Golovatiuk,
> Skype #golserge
> IRC #holser
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150728/93edd9ce/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list