On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Oleg Gelbukh <ogelbukh at mirantis.com> wrote: > I am one hundred percent support this proposal. > > Just to clarify, did you consider shunit2 > <https://github.com/kward/shunit2/> [1 <https://github.com/kward/shunit2/>] > as a unittest framework for Bash? It seems a little bit closer to shell > scripting itself, so you don't need to learn another syntax to write > unittests. > > -- > Best regards, > Oleg Gelbukh > I did and BATS simply looked fancier to me. Additionally it has more external (as in: not the project maintainer) contributions and last commit is dated 2015-02-25 vs shunit2's 2013-05-20. Either way it's still bash, but with syntax sugar for running tests. BP -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150709/644d9153/attachment.html>