Open Stack

The serie of patchsets is available here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:db_sync,n,z

Thanks in advance for your feedbacks,

--
Yanis Guenane

On 06/25/2015 10:02 AM, Yanis Guenane wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2015 04:07 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
>> On 2015-06-08 2:48 AM, Yanis Guenane wrote:
>>> If we look at openstacklib::db::postgresql[1] or
>>> openstackib::db::mysql[2] they are simple wrapper around
>>> puppet resources with no extra logic, but a common resource across all
>>> modules.
>> I see a lot of resources, relationships and logic in
>> openstackib::db::mysql. We can clearly see added value in that one.
>>
>>> Also, to move forward on this topic I will submit to a vote one of the
>>> three propositions during our next meeting
>>>
>>>  1. Abandon this change
>>>  2. Move everything to X::db::sync, but just run the exec there, no
>>> openstacklib::db::sync
>>>  3. Move forward with current implementation
>>>
>> I vote for 2 if we can make it happen in all modules and expose the same
>> interface (parameters) for consistency.
>>
> As decided during weekly meeting #37[1] option 2 was chosen.
>
> Hence a series of fixed patchset will be submitted to reflect this decision.
>
> Thank you all for your feedbacks,
>
> [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-09-15.00.log.html
>
> --
> Yanis Guenane
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev