On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:48:27PM +0300, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi all, > > As you may know, we've got experimental job [1] to run functional tests [2] > for python-cinderclient with devstack setup. > > Functional tests for python-cinderclient is very important because it's > almost the only way to test python-cinderclient with Cinder API. For now, > we've got only Rally which uses cinderclient to test Cinder. Tempest uses > own client for all APIs. > > Current tests coverage are very low.. That's why I would like to ask > everyone to contribute to python-cinderclient. I created etherpad [3] with > current progress. You can find me (e0ne) or any other core in > #openstack-cinder in IRC. > > > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > every patch to python-cinderclient? > +1 I think it is a great idea to move it to non-voting. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182528/ > [2] > https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/tree/master/cinderclient/tests/functional > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-client-functional-tests > > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev