On 7/6/15 10:28 PM, sean.mcginnis at gmx.com wrote: > I support moving it to non-voting from the experimental queue. It will > be much more visible that way if something breaks. That makes sense to me. > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Ivan Kolodyazhny" <e0ne at e0ne.info> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org> > Cc: "Oleksiy Butenko" <obutenko at mirantis.com>, "Kyrylo Romanenko" > <kromanenko at mirantis.com> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] python-cinderclient functional tests > Date: Mon, Jul 6, 2015 1:48 PM > > Hi all, > > As you may know, we've got experimental job [1] to run functional tests [2] > for python-cinderclient with devstack setup. > > Functional tests for python-cinderclient is very important because it's > almost the only way to test python-cinderclient with Cinder API. For now, > we've got only Rally which uses cinderclient to test Cinder. Tempest uses > own client for all APIs. > > Current tests coverage are very low.. That's why I would like to ask > everyone to contribute to python-cinderclient. I created etherpad [3] with > current progress. You can find me (e0ne) or any other core in > #openstack-cinder in IRC. > > > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with > every patch to python-cinderclient? > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182528/ > [2] > https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient/tree/master/cinderclient/tests/functional > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-client-functional-tests > > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >