Minwoo, The cherry-picks for the contain-updater and object-updater back to stable/juno are now available for review: https://review.openstack.org/146211 and https://review.openstack.org/134082 Jay On 01/08/2015 09:21 AM, Minwoo Bae wrote: > Hi, to whom it may concern: > > > Jay Bryant and I would like to have the fixes for the Swift > object-updater (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125746/) and the > Swift container-updater > (https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7eed122bf6b663e6e7894ace136b6f4653db4985,n,z) > backported to Juno and then to Icehouse soon if possible. It's been in > the queue for a while now, so we were wondering if we could have an > estimated time for delivery? > > Icehouse is in security-only mode, but the container-updater issue may > potentially be used as a fork-bomb, which presents security concerns. > To further justify the fix, a problem of similar nature > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126371/(regarding the object-auditor) > was successfully fixed in stable/icehouse. > > The object-updater issue may potentially have some security > implications as well. > > > Thank you very much! > > Minwoo > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150109/a2e8c809/attachment.html>