[openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics]

Ed Leafe ed at leafe.com
Thu Feb 26 20:54:45 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/26/2015 01:45 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:

> The interesting bit of those charts is that overall for OpenStack
> projects, it seems that the reviews (comments to patchsets) are arriving
> quite quickly but the new patchsets take a lot more to be submitted. 
> 
> Too much debating and commenting over each patch? Or are the
> authors/owners of the changeset slow to respond with new patches? I
> don't have an answer. I'd be happy to look at the data with other
> people.

I would think that the expansion of the spec requirements is a major
contributor to this trend. Much of the debate that used to happen with
patch sets now happens on the spec, which delays the first submission of
a patch, and shortens the time for review, since reviewers are already
familiar with the changes being proposed.

- -- Ed Leafe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=6Psn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list