On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Erdfelt <johannes at erdfelt.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote: > > Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I > > propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be > > discussed at the cross-project meeting today: > > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Cycle_Management/Liberty_Tracking > > I'm happy to see this. > ++ > > "Assignees may target their blueprint to a future milestone, as an > indication of when they intend to land it (not mandatory)" > > That seems useless to me. I have no control over when things land. I can > only control when my code is put up for review. > > Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I have > spent writing the actual code. > I think this is a symptom of a much deeper problem. And adjusting the release cadence won't make a big impact on this. > > JE > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150224/b360b522/attachment.html>