Thanks Miguel. From: Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com<mailto:majopela at redhat.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 1:10 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] LBaaS Haproxy performance benchmarking You can try with httperf[1], or ab[2] for http workloads. If you will use overlay, make sure your network MTU is correctly configured to handle the extra size of the overlay (GRE / VXLAN packets) otherwise you will be introducing fragmentation overhead on the tenant networks. [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/httperf/ [2] http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/programs/ab.html Miguel Ángel Ajo On Wednesday, 4 de February de 2015 at 01:58, Varun Lodaya wrote: Hi, We were trying to use haproxy as our LBaaS solution on the overlay. Has anybody done some baseline benchmarking with LBaaSv1 haproxy solution? Also, any recommended tools which we could use to do that? Thanks, Varun __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150204/63fbc5c0/attachment.html>