Open Stack

On 12/21/2015 11:53 PM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
>
>
> 2015-12-22 3:42 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> <mailto:mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>>:
>
>
>
>     On 12/21/2015 1:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>         Rob,
>
>         Can we set some goals for the server projects too?
>
>         Say anything deprecated in liberty timeframe in oslo libs or any
>         other
>         libs we consume should be fixed by milestone2 in mitaka? At the
>         moment
>         the burden is entirely on oslo and hence unfair.
>
>         Thanks,
>         Dims
>
>         On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Robert Collins
>         <robertc at robertcollins.net <mailto:robertc at robertcollins.net>>
>         wrote:
>
>             On 21 December 2015 at 04:57, Davanum Srinivas
>             <davanum at gmail.com <mailto:davanum at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 Nova folks,
>
>                 We have this review in oslo.utils:
>                 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252898/
>
>                 There were failed effort in the past to cleanup in Nova:
>                 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164753/
>                 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197601/
>
>                 What do we do? Suggestions please.
>
>
>             We don't remove it yet. Not till liberty-eol at the
>             earliest, or if we
>             don't get users migrated early enough, mitaka-eol.
>
>             We would benefit from an automated thing in place to tell
>             projects
>             like Nova that they are using deprecated things during CI
>             (without
>             bloating deployer logs) -  whether a keystone API, an oslo
>             config
>             option or function, or $whatever. We would also benefit from
>             a thing
>             to rollup such information from consuming projects back to the
>             deprecating project, so we can tell whether we're ready to
>             cleanup old
>             things.
>
>             I think in general that there needs to be a balance around
>             effort on
>             migrations: if oslo deprecates something - anything - we're
>             creating
>             work for consumers of oslo. Its unfair for us to do that
>             unilaterally.
>             Conversely, if projects don't migrate away from poor APIs
>             onto newer
>             better ones, they create long term maintenance work for
>             oslo: so we
>             all need to work together to coordinate such things.
>
>             https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226157/12 is part of this -
>             it is an
>             effort to bring consistency in expectations and
>             process/patterns here.
>
>             -Rob
>
>             --
>             Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hpe.com <mailto:rbtcollins at hpe.com>>
>             Distinguished Technologist
>             HP Converged Cloud
>
>             __________________________________________________________________________
>             OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>             Unsubscribe:
>             OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>             http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>     Nova also needs an Oslo liaison [1]. That used to be Joe Gordon, but
>     he's gone now. That would really be the person in Nova driving the
>     Oslo changes and review priorities.
>
>     [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Oslo
>
>     --
>
>
>    Matt, I would like to take the liaison for Nova,  I worked on both
> Nova and Oslo,  as Oslo core reviewer I attend  Oslo weekly meeting and
> will
>    help Nova and Oslo team work together smoothly.   I would like to
> submit new commit to  removing  deprecated method for Nova.
>
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Matt Riedemann
>
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> ChangBo Guo(gcb)
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

OK, I put your name in the table for nova [1], thanks.

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Oslo

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann