Open Stack

Thierry,

Right, i believe it was on IRC and not a ML thread. Since there is no
urgency on this one, we can wait till Doug gets back to revisit the
decision.

Thanks,
Dims

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 12/13/2015 10:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> On 14 December 2015 at 15:28, Matt Riedemann
>>> <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> I don't have a pressing need to backport something right now, but as
>>>> long as
>>>> there was code in oslo-incubator that *could* be synced to other
>>>> projects
>>>> which wasn't in libraries, then that code could have bugs and code
>>>> require
>>>> backports to stable/liberty oslo-incubator for syncing to projects
>>>> that use
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> I thought the thing to do was backport the application of the change
>>> from the projects master?
>>
>> Unless the rules changed, things from oslo-incubator were always
>> backported to stable oslo-incubator and then sync'ed to the stable
>> branches of the affected projects. This is so we wouldn't lose the fix
>> in stable oslo-incubator which is shared across other projects, not just
>> the target project consuming the fix from oslo-incubator.
>
> I think I remember that the Oslo crew made a change there for the last
> branch before incubator removal (something like, "backport it directly
> to the local copy"). I couldn't quickly find a thread reference though.
> Maybe wait for Doug or dims to be around and chime in.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims