Open Stack

On 1 December 2015 at 02:40, Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com> wrote:

> On 01/12/15 05:16, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> > Part of the issue is that in a year, we added all the repos above. And
> > all of said repos were all heading over to infra with the same newbie
> > questions/mistakes. Not a bad thing in and of itself, but the sheer
> > volume was causing a lot of infra load. So the infra liasions are
> > meant to buffer that; exactly the opposite of splitting again. Now add
> > that many repos again this year, and the problem doubles. The review
> > overhead for centralizing this is quite small. The mentor overhead to
> > avoid the repeated mistakes hitting infra is quite a bit higher, but
> > that has to land somewhere, and still isn’t huge.
>
> On the other hand, it may also be that we're very unlikely to see so
> many new projects again, as we have in the first 'stadium' (half-)year.
> So if this is a significant aspect of the pain that Armando is
> describing, I suspect it would be overreaction to make a big governance
> change for it - as it's unlikely to happen again.
>

I don't think we're nearly reached the inflection point.


>
> But actually I guess most of the pain is elsewhere, i.e. in the
> cognitive aspect of the Neutron PTL logically needing to understand
> everything in all of the stadium projects.
>
>     Neil
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151201/ad322686/attachment.html>