Open Stack

Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 25/08/15 06:01 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Morgan,
>>
>> Bit more radical :) I am inclined to just yank all code from
>> oslo-incubator and
>> let the projects modify/move what they have left into their own
>> package/module
>> structure (and change the contracts however they see fit).
> 
> Glad this conversation is happening, I've started to think about this
> as well. I think we're at a point were we could just let projects move
> from were they are.
> 
> However, I'd like this to be a bit more organized. For instance, if we
> dismiss oslo-incubator and let projects move forward on their own,
> it'd be better to have all the `openstack/common/` packages renamed so
> that it'll create less confusion to newcomers. At the very least, as
> Morgan mentioned, these packages could be prefixed with an `_` and
> become 'private' and 'owned' by the project.
> 
> We still need a 'deprecation' process for the code in the
> oslo-incubator repository and we would still have to accept fixes for
> previous releases.

The Death of the Incubator. Sounds like a great thing to discuss at the
Design Summit. I don't think we would kill it before start of Mitaka
anyway ?

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150826/ec119ef6/attachment.pgp>