Open Stack

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:42 PM, John Griffith <john.griffith8 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net
> > wrote:
>
>> On 19 August 2015 at 03:51, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>>
>> > So... I'm at Linux Con this week, meaning that things will be slow. I
>> > think - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208582/ (slightly updated this
>> > morning) will get devstack users working again. And I agree, we really
>> > need devstack and the gate to be convergent on their solution here, not
>> > divergent.
>>
>> So unless something has changed, devstack users are broken only on
>> Fedora - and the constraints thing won't protect them at this stage
>> because of two things.
>>
>> Firstly, the bug isn't a cryptography bug - its a setuptools / pip
>> thing resulting in the .so pip installs being in the arch neutral path
>> rather than lib64, and this would work except that devstack also
>> installs python-cffi, which then masks the pip updated one. I don't
>> know why devstack is installing the binary package :/. This is a
>> Fedora platform specific bug - it doesn't show up on Ubuntu - either
>> because devstack doesn't install the ubuntu python-cffi package, or
>> because pip/setuptools on ubuntu don't have the same disconnect with
>> system packages in the same way. I'm not sure which.
>>
>> Secondly, until we have a gate on openstack/requirements that checks
>> devstack-on-fedora, fedora developers will be exposed to this sort of
>> thing from time to time :/.
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> --
>> Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
>> Distinguished Technologist
>> HP Converged Cloud
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> ​Catching up on this thread, looks like the referenced devstk change above
> (987dc6453e8e3a8a46d748059378564c42bafc5c) merged and broke things.  Seems
> we don't install opt/stack/requirements so stack.sh is failing for third
> party CI's that don't use node-pool (suspect they'll fail when they're
> nodes are rebuilt similar to last weeks issue with keystone).
>
> Went ahead and confirmed that a fresh download and stack.sh locally fails,
> going to have a look after dinner but thought maybe somebody already knows
> what's up with this.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> ​For those that are interested, Clark pointed me to this patch [1] which
in fact the addresses the issue I was running in to.

[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214409/

Thanks,
John
​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150818/1a0bf122/attachment.html>