[openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code
Armando M.
armamig at gmail.com
Thu Apr 23 17:19:52 UTC 2015
On 23 April 2015 at 09:58, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/23/2015 12:14 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23 April 2015 at 07:32, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com
> > <mailto:rbryant at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 04/22/2015 10:33 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> > >
> > > Would it make sense to capture these projects as simply
> > > 'affiliated', ie. with a loose relationship to Neutron,
> > because
> > > they use/integrate with Neutron in some form or another
> (e.g.
> > > having 3rd-party, extending-api,
> integrating-via-plugin-model,
> > > etc)? Then we could simply consider extending the
> > projects.yaml
> > > to capture this new concept (for Neutron or any other
> project)
> > > once we defined its ontology.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > > That seems interesting, but given the communities stated goals
> > > around Big Tent, it seems to me like affiliation or not, adding
> > > these under the Neutron tent, inside the larger OpenStack
> Bigger
> > > Tent, would be a good thing.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kyle
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for clearing some of the questions I raised. I should
> > stress the
> > > fact that I welcome the idea of finding a more sensible home for
> these
> > > projects in light of the big tent developments, but it seems like
> > we're
> > > still pouring down the foundations. I'd rather get us to a point
> where
> > > the landscape is clear, and the dust settled. That would help us
> > make a
> > > more informed decision compared to the one we can make right now.
> >
> > Can you be a bit more specific about what's not clear and would help
> > make you feel more informed?
> >
> >
> > I am not clear on how we make a decision, as to which project belongs or
> > doesn't to the Neutron 'umbrella', 'tent', 'stadium' or however we end
> > up calling it :)
>
> OK, that's fine. Figuring that out is the next step if folks agree with
> Neutron as the home for networking-foo repos. I'm happy to write up a
> strawman proposal for inclusion criteria and a set of expectations
> around responsibilities and communication.
>
>
What about the other Neutron related ones that didn't strictly follow the
networking- prefix in the name, would the naming convention be one of the
criteria? I look forward to your proposal.
Thanks,
Armando
> --
> Russell Bryant
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150423/98db35d5/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list