Open Stack

On Apr 22, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Devananda van der Veen <devananda.vdv at gmail.com> wrote:

> Being a member of the technical committee is not merely a commitment of a few hours a week; it is not just a forum for resolving differences between two or three projects; and it's definitely not a social club or popularity contest.
> 
> First and foremost, it is an elected body of representatives. I believe the members should *represent* OpenStack's technical constituency -- both internally and externally. On the one hand, that means listening to the technical community, understanding the issues within and between projects, being both willing and capable to jump in and address them when necessary; and on the other hand, representing that constituency to the broader community.

Thanks for writing this, as well as your other points. I couldn't agree more with those sentiments.


-- Ed Leafe





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150423/bc8f9b49/attachment.pgp>