Open Stack

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
mangelajo at redhat.com> wrote:

> Why would operators install from devstack? that’s not going to be the case.
>

If they do they need more help than we can give...


> I believe we should have both LB & OVS well tested, if LB is a good option
> for
> some operators willing to migrate from nova, that’s great, let’s make sure
> LB
> is perfectly tested upstream.
>

+1


> But by doing such change we can’t let OVS code rot and we would be
> neglecting
> a big customer base which is now making use of the openvswitch mechanism.
> (may be I’m miss understanding  the scope of the change).
>

Changing DevStack's default doesn't remove anything OVS-related, nor does
it by itself remove any OVS jobs.  It gives everyone who is happy with
nova-net (or more correctly doesn't think about it) a new default that
changes their experience the least for when nova-net disappears.

dt

-- 

Dean Troyer
dtroyer at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150414/bbb2960d/attachment.html>