Open Stack

Jay,

Thanks for staying on top of updating & opening Liberty specs, and for all
your help with specs during Kilo!

-Deva

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM Jay Faulkner <jay at jvf.cc> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just a note to let you know Liberty specs are open for Ironic.
>
> Template Changes
> ————————
> There are two minor changes to the spec template for Liberty:
>  - State Machine Impact is now a full section, where changes to Ironic’s
> State Machine should be called out.
>  - In the REST API Impact section, submitters should indicate if the
> microversion should be incremented as part of the change.
>
>
> Kilo Specs
> —————
> If you had a spec approved for Kilo that didn’t get implemented, please
> put in a merge request moving the spec from kilo-archive/ to liberty/, and
> ensure your spec complies with the new template by adding a State Machine
> Impact section and indicating any microversion version changes needed in
> the REST API Impact section.
>
>
> Backlog Specs
> ———————
> As a reminder; Ironic does still employ a spec backlog for desired
> features that aren’t ready for implementation due to time, priority, or
> dependencies. If there are any specs currently in the backlog you’d like to
> propose for Liberty, please move it from backlog/ to liberty/ and add the
> additional required information for a full spec.
>
>
> Thanks to everyone for a successful Kilo cycle, and I’m looking forward to
> seeing the new slate of ideas for Liberty.
>
>
> -
> Jay Faulkner
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150413/f5fa59f1/attachment.html>