Open Stack

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
wrote:

> Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> > Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here.
> >
> > A couple more:
> >
> > 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents
> what the goal of it is: Infrastructure Services?
> > 2. We need to be be open to having other Layer #1s within the community.
> We should allow for similar collaborations and group focus to grow up as
> well. Storage Services? Platform Services? Computation Services?
>
> I think that would nullify most of the benefits of Monty's proposal. If
> we keep on blessing "themes" or special groups, we'll soon be back at
> step 0, with projects banging on the TC door to become special, and
> companies not allocating resources to anything that's not special.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

​Great stuff, mixed on point 2 raised by Vish but honestly I think that's
something that could evolve over time, but I looked at that differently as
in Cinder, SWIFT and some day Manilla live under a Storage Services
umbrella, and ideally at some point there's some convergence there.

Anyway, I don't want to start a rat-hole on that, it's kind of irrelevant
right now.  Bottom line is I think the direction and initial ideas in
Monty's post are what a lot of us have been thinking about and looking for.
 I'm in!!​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140919/bf673f9c/attachment.html>