On 17/09/14 14:40, Charles Crouch wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi, >> >> as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last >> week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews >> (like gerrit used to do when I were a lad). >> >> The specific criteria discussed was 'items that have a -1 from a core >> but no response from author for 14 days'. This topic came up again >> during today's meeting and it wasn't clear if the intention was for >> cores to start enforcing this? So: >> >> Do we start setting WIP/workflow -1 for those reviews that have a -1 >> from a core but no response from author for 14 days >> >> thanks, marios >> >> [1] >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-09-09-19.04.log.html > > So it looks like this has already started.. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105275/ > > I think we need to document on the wiki *precisely* the criteria for setting > WIP/workflow -1. Yup, we definitely should > For example that review above has a Jenkins failure but no > core reviews at all. FWIW I reckon a jenkins -1 should also start the 2 week clock but in the case you've linked the -1 was only 2 days ago so should have remained untouched. > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >