Open Stack

Hi Stackers!

I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release.

There're a lot of open questions for now:

   - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge?
   - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements
   - etc.

Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try it. I
moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's only one
of the possible solution to start work on it.

All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2].

[1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just a PoC.

[1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage
[2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still failed.

Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info> wrote:

> Hi All!
>
> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on
> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want be
> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page.
>
> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to discuss [3]
> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some feedback
> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this discussion on
> mailing list for all projects.
>
> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova and
> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and
> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over.
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick
> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014
> [3]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html
> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary
>
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140916/7c70392b/attachment.html>