Open Stack

By which John means "generally trying to avoid filling".

Michael

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com> wrote:
> On 2 September 2014 15:27, Matthew Booth <mbooth at redhat.com> wrote:
>> We've been playing a game recently between oslo.vmware and the refactor
>> series where a patch from the refactor series goes in, requiring a
>> rebase of oslo.vmware daily. After a brief discussion with garyk earlier
>> I decided to head that off by rebasing the refactor series on top of
>> oslo.vmware, which has been sat in the integrated queue in the gate for
>> over 5 hours now. i.e. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will now go in
>> before anything else.
>>
>> Unfortunately, in doing that I have had to lose +2 +A on 4 refactor
>> series patches. I made a note of who had approved them:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
>> Brian Elliott +2
>> John Garbutt +2 +A
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
>> Daniel Berrange +2
>> Andrew Laski +2
>> John Garbutt +2 +A
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
>> Brian Elliott +2
>> Andrew Laski +2
>> John Garbutt +2 +A
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
>> Brian Elliott +2
>> Andrew Laski +2
>> John Garbutt +2 +A
>>
>> These patches have been lightly touched to resolve merge conflicts with
>> the oslo.vmware integration, but no more. If people could take another
>> quick look I'd be very grateful.
>
> If stuff was approved, and you have rebased, just reach out for cores
> on (or us) on IRC. Thats a general invite, particularly at this FF
> sort of time.
>
> Generally trying to to fill the ML with review requests.
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Rackspace Australia