Open Stack

On 10/02/2014 11:14 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 11:23 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote:
>> As I re-read this I think maybe you have answered my question but want
>> to be clear.  You feel that 'State' is the only term that should be
>> used.  Based on the definitions above, that would make sense. The
>> complication is there are may places in the code where a variable like
>> 'status' is used.  Don't think we are going to be able to go back and
>> fix all those, but it would be something that is good to watch for in
>> reviews in the future.
>
> I'm talking about new versions of the public APIs that get proposed, 
> not existing ones. Within the codebase, it would be great to use a 
> single term "state" for this, prefixed with a refining descriptor like 
> "power_", "task_", etc. But that's a lesser concern for me than our 
> next generation REST APIs.
>
> Best,
> -anotherjay
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks for the clarification.  I think the proposal is a good idea.

-theotherjay